A monarch regards the land and the people under his reign as personal property. He engages in the monopolistic exploitation of this "property." Under democracy, monopoly and monopolistic exploitation do not disappear. An “elected” steward, which may be an elected oligarchy, is put in monopolistic charge of the country. The elected steward does not own the country, but as long as he occupies the office he is permitted to use it to his advantage. He owns the current use of the land and the people, but not its perpetual use.
In a perfect world, a democracy would ideally make one more free. The problem is, we do not live in a perfect world. Democracy’s have been infiltrated with woke, selfish, and evil people with evil agendas.
Democracy is based on the anti-Realist ideology of Liberalism.
Liberalism is the idea (the lie) that the distance (or the relation) between king above subjects below is not the King's person, but property (or "rights") of the subjects below. That relation of superiority however belongs to the king. Liberalism started with this very attempt at questioning the distance (or superiority) of God above and men below. From then, Liberalism doubted every other "inequality": property owner over non-owner, man over woman, master over slave, one race over another, one wage over another. Equality is envy. Liberalism is the internal logic of envy
My heart is bleeding for you Jeff. I’m watching you on infowars right now and having gone through corrupt family court for almost 9 years also, I am praying for you brother. I also had custody of my son about 90% of the time and also hired Koons Fuller and they screwed me too and I lost everything.
Are the people more free under Monarchy or Democracy?
In a perfect world, a democracy would ideally make one more free. The problem is, we do not live in a perfect world. Democracy’s have been infiltrated with woke, selfish, and evil people with evil agendas.
Democracy is based on the anti-Realist ideology of Liberalism.
Liberalism is the idea (the lie) that the distance (or the relation) between king above subjects below is not the King's person, but property (or "rights") of the subjects below. That relation of superiority however belongs to the king. Liberalism started with this very attempt at questioning the distance (or superiority) of God above and men below. From then, Liberalism doubted every other "inequality": property owner over non-owner, man over woman, master over slave, one race over another, one wage over another. Equality is envy. Liberalism is the internal logic of envy
Hoppe makes the case pretty well
My heart is bleeding for you Jeff. I’m watching you on infowars right now and having gone through corrupt family court for almost 9 years also, I am praying for you brother. I also had custody of my son about 90% of the time and also hired Koons Fuller and they screwed me too and I lost everything.